Independent line of sight
The independent line of
sight meant that two gunlayers were used, one on the right side controlling
elevation, one on left controlling the range. This speeded up gunlaying, especially
with direct fire against at moving targets, and increased the rate of fire.
It was first brought out by the French in their 75mm Mle 1897 field gun, and
was later adopted also by the British army. Although both Krupp and
Rheinmetall had introduced carriages with sight of this type, the German army
did not appreciate them. The difficulty of
fitting reciprocating sights to carriages of this type was an objection
against its introduction. Moreover Germans military experts
emphasized that the advantage of the independent line of sight was scarce, thinking that the
question of rapid fire in the field artillery had less to do with slow laying
operations than with preparating ammunition. Usually the
armies which bought French guns choose the independent line of sight, while
who adopted German guns, preferred the ordinary way of sighting, where all
laying operation were performed by one man, the gun layer. The main exception was The quadrant elevation
of the piece consisted of two parts: - the elevation necessary to reach the target if it
were on the same level as the gun. - the correction to this elevation required by the
difference of level of the gun and target (angle of site). With the independent
line of sight the two parts of the quadrant elevation were applied to the gun
independently. An intermediate rocker and two elevating systems, A and B,
were provided as shown in the picture. The sight was fixed to the rocker, and
for direct fire the gunlayer handled the lower elevation system (A), which
moved the rocker as well as the gun in elevation. In this way the angle of
site was automatically corrected, when the line of sight was brought upon the
target. The other elevating
mechanism (B) was between the rocker and the gun and was handled by another
gunner who elevated the gun until the proper range appeared on a range scale.
The change in range did not affect the setting of the lower elevating
mechanism, and the gunlayer was thus free to devote his whole time to keeping
his line of sight upon the target, without being compelled to take his eye
from the telescope. The above method has the objection, however, that it is
difficult to make the necessary correction in the range drum for difference
in level of trunnion axis. |
Artillery
equipments at the beginning of World War I |
|||
Country |
Maker |
Calibre |
Adoption year |
Field guns fitted with independent line of sigh |
|||
|
Krupp |
75mm |
1908 |
|
Krupp |
75mm |
1910 |
|
Skoda |
75mm |
1912 |
|
Vickers |
76.2mm |
1903 |
|
Vickers |
83.8mm |
1903 |
|
Puteaux |
75mm |
1897 |
|
Schneider |
75mm |
1912 |
|
Schneider |
75mm |
1906 |
|
Krupp |
75mm |
1906 |
|
Krupp |
75mm |
1911 |
|
Deport |
75mm |
1911 |
|
St. Chamond |
75mm |
1902 |
|
Schneider |
75mm |
1904 |
|
Schneider |
76.2mm |
1913 |
|
Schneider |
75mm |
1907 |
|
Schneider |
75mm |
1906 |
|
Krupp |
75mm |
1902 |
Field guns not fitted with independent line of sight |
|||
|
Skoda |
76.5mm |
1905 |
|
Krupp – Cockerill |
75mm |
1905 |
|
Krupp |
75mm |
1905 |
|
Schneider |
75mm |
1904 |
|
Krupp |
75mm |
1902 |
|
Krupp – Rheinmetall |
77mm |
1896/1906 |
|
Krupp |
75mm |
1903 |
|
Krupp – Arsenal |
75mm |
1905 |
|
Rheinmetall |
75mm |
1901 |
|
Krupp |
75mm |
1903 |
|
Putilov |
76.2mm |
1900 |
|
Putilov |
76.2mm |
1902 |
|
Krupp |
75mm |
1903 |
|
Krupp |
75mm |
1903 |