The question of the defence
of Sofia
In
1879, when the country was
liberated from the Turks, Sofia was defended by some redoubts (tabja) : 1.
the fortification north-east of the church of Santa
Sofia, on the terrace above the district of Kjuljutzit, 2.
the Slatinskja lunette
near the War School, 3.
the Aiva-dede redoubt at
the ecclesiastical seminary, 4.
the tabja Evrejska at the Macedonia brewery, raised in 1854 during
the Crimean War, 5.
the
Kuru-bulgar and Konövitza
redoubts, built in 1876 during the Serbo-Turkish
war. They
were all earthworks with a high profile, as was the custom at the time, and
now had limited war value, so they were abandoned and
progressively blended into the landscape. The
Army General Staff began to directly face up the
problems related to the defence of Sofia in 1890. On the initiative of the Military Minister col. Mihail Savov, a special
commission was set up. It was presided by the chief of the general staff lt.col. Racho Petrov,
and it was composed by the staff officers major Stefan Paprikov,
Nikola Ivanov, Krastju Marinov and Mihail Andreev.
Their task was to study how to defend the country from an enemy coming from
west. They examined many alternatives for the construction of fortified lines
in the area of Godech, Slivnitza
and Dragoman. Different plans were proposed such as
the construction of reinforced concrete fortifications, earthworks, the use
of the natural defence offered by the mountains, and so on. Prime
Minister Stefan Stambulov suggested to consult gen. Henri Brialmont,
a well-known Belgian fortification specialist. Therefore, col. Nikola Ivanov, the deputy chief of staff of the Army, went to
Brussels to discuss the matter with him. Brialmont
the immediate protection of Sofia the construction of an expensive reinforced
concrete fortification, to which Belgian companies were interested, although
the progress of the war technique might make them useless or ineffective,
even before its completion. The
reference model was the defensive belt of Bucharest, recently designed by
general Brialmont (1883), in particular, the
commission examined a quadrangular fort equipped with thick concrete
protection (type 3 of the Bucharest fortress). To reduce the cost of the work
and simplify its construction, it was decided to
introduce various modifications to the initial project and to considerably
reduce the thickness of the concrete walls. The
plan of the new fort was quadrangular, the external
trapezoidal ditch became triangular with ramparts parapets. The trenches were shelled with frontal infantry fire and with light
57mm guns in armoured cupolas, placed in the corners (in concrete nests d). In the middle
there was a concrete barrack (k),
on each side two barbettes with emplacements (b) for 12cm or 15cm fortress guns, separated by small (n) or large (m) traverses. Overall, compared to the original one, the new
structure of the fort was extremely simplified. The
commission decided to defend the north-western
sector, placing the fort in front of the Vladaja-Buchino
gorge and the Lom-Vratza road. The construction
began in the summer of 1891 and
proceeded slowly: by February 1895, only three forts had been built, but not yet armed. The other four were
completed by the end of the century. Although it was
planned to arm each fort with four to six heavy fortress guns, they
received only 57mm QF guns for the close defence. The forts were built at Mramor, Iljantzi, Vrbnitza, Obelja, Filipovtzi, Konövitza, Leulju. Except Konövitza and Leulju, all the
fortifications were placed on small heights. The distance
between the forts was 2-8 km, and from the fortifications to Sofia was 4-9 km. The
decision not to protect Sofia with a powerful belt of forts like that of
Bucharest was linked to the Bulgarian military
doctrine of the time, which relied entirely on the manoeuvre. It was
confident that a modern army with a powerful penetrating force would be able
to protect the country’s borders without locking itself in fortifications. For
this purpose it was enough to have temporary
fortifications and some concrete strongpoints, mainly intended for ammunition.
For the immediate defence of Sofia it would have been enough to control the Vladaja gorge, the Petrohan
pass, the roads that passed through there and the Orahnie
road, which cuts the Vakarel hill. A good
protection of these approaches to the capital would have prevented the
penetration of a large enemy force in the plain of Sofia. Therefore,
at the beginning of the 19th century plans began to be
drawn up to extend the defensive line of Sofia. In 1901, Captain Simeon Dobrevski submitted to the engineering inspection a project,
which included Vitosha and Ljulin
in the defence system of the capital. The Inspection forwarded it to Army
Headquarters and in 1904,
it was formalized in the Project for the
fortress of Sofia, which, however, remained only on paper. During
the inter-allied war and the First World War, the defence of the capital was integrated only with minor field fortifications. |